The Sit-at-Home (SAH) directive represents a form of nonviolent resistance, wherein individuals or communities deliberately remain indoors as a method of protest. In Nigeria’s South-East geopolitical zone, this method has become widespread, particularly on Mondays. It is commonly observed in response to directives from the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), aimed at expressing disapproval over the continued detention of its leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, by the Department of State Services (DSS), as well as concerns about the region’s political marginalization. The SAH campaign has had far-reaching economic implications for the region. Economic activity has notably declined, disrupting commercial operations, market functions, and income generation across various sectors. This impact is particularly profound among small businesses, which constitute a critical component of the region’s economic framework. The transportation sector has also been adversely affected, with commercial vehicles significantly reducing operations on SAH days, thereby limiting the movement of goods and people. The uncertainty and perceived instability associated with the SAH order have dampened investor confidence. Potential and existing investors are increasingly reluctant to channel resources into the region, leading to decreased foreign direct investment (FDI) and a noticeable drop in capital inflow. Given this context, the study assessed the economic consequences of the SAH directive in the South-Eastern states Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo since its inception in 2020. Employing the social movement theory and utilizing secondary data, the research revealed that the SAH observance has contributed to diminished economic productivity, investor apprehension, and widespread socio-economic hardships, including poverty and emotional distress. It has also negatively impacted tourism, a key economic sector in the region.In response to these findings, the study proposed several recommendations. Chief among them is the urgent need for constructive dialogue between the Federal Government and pro-Biafra agitators to address the root causes of the SAH protests. It also advocated for greater political inclusion of the South-East at the national level, increased federal investment in regional infrastructure, the creation of employment opportunities for young people, and the expedited release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu as a gesture toward national reconciliation.

Keywords: IPOB, Sit-At-Home, Political,  Economic South-East